1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Banks Get $1.5 Trillion Bailout Over Coronavirus

Discussion in 'US Politics' started by Frank Underwood, Mar 17, 2020.

  1. Frank Underwood

    Frank Underwood Soap Chat Enthusiast EXP: 18 Years

    Threads:
    286
    Messages:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    3,797
    Ratings:
    +1,076
    I notice this doesn't have the corporate hack pundits or the establishment politicians asking "how are you going to pay for that?"

     
  2. Angela Channing

    Angela Channing World Cup of Soaps Moderator EXP: 20 Years

    Threads:
    181
    Messages:
    7,615
    Trophy Points:
    7,960
    Ratings:
    +11,846
    Also, who is going to bail out the workers who have to self-isolate and may receive no income during this period as a result?

    It's always the way, take care of the rich business owners and f**k everyone else.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Frank Underwood

    Frank Underwood Soap Chat Enthusiast EXP: 18 Years

    Threads:
    286
    Messages:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    3,797
    Ratings:
    +1,076
    Pelosi's Coronavirus Compromise Has Left Even Tom Cotton Saying This Bill 'Doesn't Go Far Enough and Fast Enough'

    Progressives and political journalists were not the only observers pointing out glaring weaknesses in the coronavirus relief bill pushed by House Democrats—as the U.S. Senate took up the legislation, at least two Senate Republicans said publicly that bolder initiatives offering direct assistance to Americans during the pandemic should be included in a relief package.

    "Every American adult should immediately receive $1,000 to help ensure families and workers can meet their short-term obligations and increase spending in the economy," Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said Monday.

    Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton also said House Democrats were insufficiently ambitious in their plan to assist Americans, officially called the Families First Coronavirus Response Act.

    The bill includes free coronavirus testing for all Americans, strengthened nutritional assistance and unemployment programs, and paid sick leave—but leaves millions of Americans out of the latter provision, allowing large companies employing more than 500 people to forgo paid sick leave for workers.

    "The House relief bill doesn't go far enough and fast enough," Cotton tweeted. "We're going to do everything we can to get cash into the hands of affected workers and families as quickly as possible so we can all get through this pandemic together."

    Cotton appeared on Fox News to express his views on the bill.

    "If you've got the virus, if you've been quarantined because you've been exposed to the virus, if your business has been shut down, or even if you have to stay home to care for a child because school is closed, you should not worry about buying the groceries, paying the car payments, paying your rent," Cotton said, echoing sentiments expressed recently by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).

    The comments from Romney and Cotton drew the attention of Sanders' senior policy advisor, Alex Jacquez.

    The final House bill was passed Friday night after negotiations between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin—resulting in some compromises which Eileen Appelbaum, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), called "egregious" in an op-ed published Monday at Common Dreams.

    "The [paid sick leave provision] excludes workers at big companies like Whole Foods and McDonald's as well as those at Walmart and Target, whose CEOs appeared with President Trump on Friday afternoon as he declared a national health emergency," Appelbaum wrote, suggesting that such concessions to the White House may not even have been necessary in the midst of a global and national public health crisis:

    It's not possible to know what would have happened if House Democrats had not engaged in negotiations with the Trump administration over the bill. The original bill could have passed in the House even without the support of Republicans, although it is likely that some may have voted for it. But what about the Republican-controlled Senate? GOP senators were wary of returning to their districts without passing something that would protect the public's health and that would bailout their constituents. It is not difficult to imagine that some would have broken with the administration and voted for a more robust bill without carve outs for big employers.

    Journalist Adam Johnson of The Appeal viewed Romney's and Cotton's calls for more far-reaching assistance with skepticism and denounced Pelosi for giving Republicans the opportunity to cast themselves as being firmly on the side of working Americans.

    "They're obviously cynical phonies but this is what happens when the most powerful Democrat in the country is a conservative deficit scold who constantly nickel and dimes emergency relief bills during a mass crisis," Johnson tweeted.

    While acknowledging that the Republicans' comments suggested that "the political ground is shifting very, very fast" regarding support needed for Americans, Ryan Cooper of The Week also criticized the Democratic leaders for failing to fight for workers themselves.

    Ocasio-Cortez warned that with Republicans joining the national conversation about direct assistance to Americans, political observers should be wary of right-wing and liberatarian approaches to universal basic income (UBI), which often hinge on eliminating other government programs like nutritional and housing assistance.

    "Not every UBI policy is created equal," Ocasio-Cortez said. "Some are structured in predatory ways to gut the safety net and reward banks, others are better with people’s well-being in mind. Be careful."

    Source: https://www.commondreams.org/news/2...eft-even-tom-cotton-saying-bill-doesnt-go-far
     
  4. Zable

    Zable Soap Chat TV Fanatic EXP: 3 Years

    Threads:
    24
    Messages:
    1,490
    Trophy Points:
    690
    Ratings:
    +868
    Isn't this the bill that got passed by the Senate after a 2-day delay by Rand Paul over the amendments he wanted, and now they are working on version 3, or am I getting it muddled with something else? I think the aim is to get aid out quick even as they go to work on new and improved versions.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2020
  5. Frank Underwood

    Frank Underwood Soap Chat Enthusiast EXP: 18 Years

    Threads:
    286
    Messages:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    3,797
    Ratings:
    +1,076
    ‘Extraordinary change’: How coronavirus is rewiring the Republican and Democratic parties
    The pandemic could alter politics for a generation — or even longer.

    The 2008 financial crisis reshaped American politics, birthing a politics of outrage in the Tea Party on the right and an enduring strain of progressive populism on the left.

    The coronavirus is already on a similar trajectory, triggering massive prospective bailouts and other policy proposals that stand to rewire the Republican and Democratic parties for a generation — or longer.

    Last week, Republicans joined Democrats — and in some cases got in front of them — in calling for direct payments to Americans to help cope with the economic fallout from the pandemic. The Trump administration, after laboring for years to repeal Obamacare, said it was considering creating a special enrollment period for the program due to the coronavirus. When Donald Trump himself suggested the government could take equity stakes in private companies that receive federal aid, it was a Democratic governor, Colorado’s Jared Polis, who accused the president of being a socialist.

    The immediate effects of the pandemic on blurring the parties’ ideological distinctions have been acute — and the virus’ toll still remains far from reaching its peak.

    “It’s crazy,” said Kelly Dietrich, founder of the National Democratic Training Committee, which trains candidates across the country. “Up is down, north is south.”

    Or as Mike Madrid, a longtime Republican strategist in California, put it, “It’s kind of nuts.”

    He said, “We are in for extraordinary change.”

    Over the weekend, Republicans and Democrats neared a deal on a rescue package that could cost at least $1.6 trillion, the most expensive such package in U.S. history. Bipartisan support for such a measure has been heralded by Democrats as an endorsement of expansive government intervention — in large part because elements of the spending, including $250 billion in direct payments to Americans, are now a priority of Republicans.

    Former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, a former Agriculture secretary in the Obama administration, said in an email that the “song of ‘government is the problem not the solution’ and the ‘era of big government is over’ may not be [an] underlying theme from this point forward.”

    And former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said “some of the issues that are being proposed and voted on now are going to become the norm in our political system, both with Republicans and Democrats.”

    He predicted that new normal including paid sick leave, and even guaranteed income of some kind. “In other words,” Richardson said, “the era of big government is back, and both parties are going to embrace it to resolve problems. And [the change] is caused by the virus.”

    Republicans, too, see this shift unfolding. As negotiations over a rescue picked up in Washington last week, it was Republicans pressing for direct cash assistance to Americans, irritating progressive Democrats who feared the GOP was out-flanking the Democratic Party on the left.

    As the two sides maneuvered, Sal Russo, a former Ronald Reagan aide and Tea Party Express co-founder, recalled the speeches he gave years ago about the esteem of the federal government swelling amid the New Deal and through the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations, before eroding in recent generations.

    Now, he said, “You’ve got the federal government … doing good deeds again.

    Russo predicted Congress will “get excessive” in its coronavirus response. But he said most Americans will see its involvement positively and that “this may be a boost for the role of the federal government.”

    “In some ways,” he said, “the promoters of big government should hope Trump is a hero.”

    The prospect of upheaval isn’t an abstract notion. The 9/11 terrorist attacks — and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that resulted from them — spurred an anti-interventionist movement that led to Barack Obama’s nomination in 2008 and still resonates within the Democratic Party. The financial disaster in 2008 conceived not only the Tea Party, but an Occupy Wall Street movement that shifted the national conversation around economic inequality and the “1 percent” — catalyzing the rise of the populist progressive wing of the Democratic Party.

    But unlike many past crises, the coronavirus pandemic has caused turmoil in the economy, public health and politics all at once. The death toll is rising. The stock market is in freefall. The virus has consumed Trump’s presidency and his re-election prospects, and it has all but frozen the Democratic presidential primary in time.

    “Parties go back and forth, and they change somewhat,” said Ron Kaufman, the Republican National Committee treasurer and a former adviser to George H.W. Bush. “And this is going to be a big change.”

    Kaufman said the longer-lasting effect of the pandemic may not be a sustained appetite to spend, but an eventual “sea change” politically as fiscal conservatives attempt to reconcile debt from the coronavirus response.

    “That will change our foreign policy viewpoint, it will change our military viewpoint … It’s going to change how we look at our place in the world,” Kaufman said.

    The effect of the pandemic, he said, is that “both parties are going to have to – we’re going to have to come to the left and they’re going to have to come to the right a little bit.”

    That the parties are coming together at all on major legislation is, of itself, a remarkable turn from the intransigence that has defined Washington since Trump won election in 2016 and Democrats regained control of the House two years later. Joe Lieberman, the former Connecticut senator, described the current landscape in Washington as an “extremely partisan time, ideologically divided time in our government — worse than 2008 and 2009 by far, I’m afraid.”

    Still, Republicans and Democrats are “coming together to get things done,” he said, adding that “if it works — which I hope and believe it will, if they do enough quickly enough — maybe there won’t be a dominant counter-reaction among Democrats or Republicans left or right.”

    Yet already, the pandemic has emboldened Democrats’ calls for more comprehensive health care and employee benefits, with the crisis laying bare not only shortcomings within the nation’s health care system, but the precariousness of Americans’ financial condition. Retirement accounts have been ravaged and unemployment claims are soaring.

    David Pepper, chairman of the Ohio Democratic Party, said the pandemic has exposed “just that the current state of affairs just leaves so many Americans living right on the edge of disaster, and we’d heard these studies for years.”

    “This just bears this out,” he said. “It tells you what an unstable status quo we’re living in to start … That is something that might reframe politics for a long time.”

    Progressive Democrats, anticipating a recession and high rates of unemployment, are preparing to use the coronavirus pandemic to draw their party to the left on economic policy, attempting to broaden support for a Green New Deal as a way to spur employment while decarbonizing the economy. And they are watching party leaders closely in negotiations for the rescue package — and demanding constraints on corporations that receive federal aid, as well as guarantees for the working class.

    Charles Chamberlain, chairman of the liberal political action committee Democracy for America, said “We’re in a moment right now where obviously one of the long-term impacts of the coronavirus is likely to be a complete restructure of our economy.”

    If there is a time for that, this would appear to be it. Three members of Congress have tested positive for the coronavirus. Democratic primaries are being postponed, and the likely nominee, Joe Biden, has been reduced to a character on a livestream.

    “What we’re seeing now,” said Madrid, the Republican strategist, is representative democracy’s “inability to deal with societal fragmentation.”

    In the same way that the music, food and media industries have been upended during the past 20 years, he said, broad cultural shifts are “just now hitting the last social institution, which is representative government.”

    The country will soon “find other ways of voting and engaging civically,” Madrid said.

    The coronavirus, he said, may be “the accelerant.”

    Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/23/coronavirus-rewiring-republican-democratic-parties-141298
     
  6. Frank Underwood

    Frank Underwood Soap Chat Enthusiast EXP: 18 Years

    Threads:
    286
    Messages:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    3,797
    Ratings:
    +1,076


     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2020
  7. Frank Underwood

    Frank Underwood Soap Chat Enthusiast EXP: 18 Years

    Threads:
    286
    Messages:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    3,797
    Ratings:
    +1,076
    Stimulus Showers Corporations With Cash & Screws Citizens
     
  8. Snarky's Ghost

    Snarky's Ghost Soap Chat Oracle EXP: 19 Years

    Threads:
    518
    Messages:
    7,133
    Trophy Points:
    6,136
    Occupation:
    INFJ
    Location:
    Haunting that cozy cellar under Falcon Crest
    Ratings:
    +9,191
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Snarky's Ghost

    Snarky's Ghost Soap Chat Oracle EXP: 19 Years

    Threads:
    518
    Messages:
    7,133
    Trophy Points:
    6,136
    Occupation:
    INFJ
    Location:
    Haunting that cozy cellar under Falcon Crest
    Ratings:
    +9,191
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Snarky's Ghost

    Snarky's Ghost Soap Chat Oracle EXP: 19 Years

    Threads:
    518
    Messages:
    7,133
    Trophy Points:
    6,136
    Occupation:
    INFJ
    Location:
    Haunting that cozy cellar under Falcon Crest
    Ratings:
    +9,191

Share This Page