Commonwealth in secret talks about who will succeed Queen Elizabeth

Discussion in 'UK Politics' started by Dew Melons, Feb 13, 2018.

  1. Dew Melons

    Dew Melons Super Moderator Staff Member Original Member Since 1998

    Message Count:
    3,073
    Trophy Points:
    5,636
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Ratings:
    +3,953
    Member Since:
    1998
    I'm not a fan of Charles and would happily see the crown passed to William...



    The Commonwealth has secretly begun considering who might succeed the Queen as its head, the BBC has learned.

    The issue is hugely sensitive because the role is not hereditary and will not pass automatically to the Prince of Wales on the Queen's death.

    The Commonwealth has set up a "high level group" to look at the way the international organisation is governed.

    This group is meeting later, officially to review how the Commonwealth is run by its secretariat and governors.

    However, senior sources added that the gathering in London would also consider what happens when the Queen, who turns 92 in April, dies.

    One said: "I imagine the question of the succession, however distasteful it may naturally be, will come up."

    The agenda for the all-day summit, seen by the BBC, says there will be a discussion of "wider governance considerations" which insiders say is code for the succession.

    The group is expected to report to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in London in April, which is likely to be the last that the 91-year-old monarch will attend.

    A second source said the issue of the succession is expected to be discussed by Commonwealth leaders on the margins of the summit, particularly when they meet without officials "on retreat" at Windsor Castle.

    The Queen was proclaimed Head of the Commonwealth at her coronation in 1953, when she was head of state in seven of its eight members.

    Although the Queen took over from her father George VI, it is not an hereditary position that will pass automatically to her son - who will be head of state in only 15 of the 53 member nations that now make up the Commonwealth.

    A second source said the issue of the succession is expected to be discussed by Commonwealth leaders on the margins of the summit, particularly when they meet without officials "on retreat" at Windsor Castle.
     
  2. Angela Christmas

    Angela Christmas Soap Chat Warrior

    Message Count:
    5,427
    Trophy Points:
    7,960
    Ratings:
    +7,783
    Member Since:
    1999
    The Commonwealth should have an elected leader that can take the institution forward rather than have an overprivileged monarch imposed on it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Dew Melons

    Dew Melons Super Moderator Staff Member Original Member Since 1998

    Message Count:
    3,073
    Trophy Points:
    5,636
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Ratings:
    +3,953
    Member Since:
    1998
    I agree @Angela Channing - or at least the public should decide. Charles will never be King in my eyes.
     
  4. ArchieLucasCarringtonEwing1989

    ArchieLucasCarringtonEwing1989 Soap Chat Addict

    Message Count:
    1,053
    Trophy Points:
    892
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +1,613
    Member Since:
    22nd June 2010
    No way should Charles be king, it should be passed on to William, someone with a modern outlook to take Britain and the commonwealth forward.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Michael Yule Torrance

    Michael Yule Torrance Soap Chat TV Fanatic

    Message Count:
    1,350
    Trophy Points:
    892
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alexis' studio
    Ratings:
    +2,062
    Gender:
    Male
    Member Since:
    2017 I think (unless it is 2016)
    But can one imagine Charles being king and William head of the commonwealth?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Emeleez Navidad

    Emeleez Navidad Soap Chat Enthusiast

    Message Count:
    2,340
    Trophy Points:
    2,242
    Location:
    Sweden
    Ratings:
    +4,100
    I feel that it should be passed to Charles because William still has young children who could need a more present father.
    Same reason why I hope the king of Sweden will live a very long time, cause Crown Princess Victoria still has very young children.
    Better pass the title off to someone older than a parent of young kids - for the kids' sake.
     

Share This Page