Episode Structure & Scene Length

Discussion in 'Dynasty 2017' started by Gabriel Maxwell, May 11, 2019.

  1. Matthew Blaisdel

    Matthew Blaisdel Soap Chat Dream Maker

    Message Count:
    1,764
    Trophy Points:
    2,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    past orbit, on the way out of the solar system
    Ratings:
    +3,071
    Medals:
    2
    Member Since:
    sometime 2005 (i guess)
    So ... they are all just much dumber now than back in the 80s?
    Thanks, Insta, Facebook and Twitter, well done! :bravo:
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2019
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. Tony

    Tony Soap Chat Active Member

    Message Count:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    1,781
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +265
    I think Gabriel is right - nu Dynasty is obviously being made as cost efficient as possible, even the early critics remarked how 'slightly cheap' it looked, at least compared to the original's pilot.

    I read a Doug Cramer interview saying that in Dynasty they replaced a quarter of the cast, which was a way of cutting costs down as well as freshening up the plot.

    Which I guess is why Nicolette Sheridan, James McKay and Nathalie Kelley have been replaced by Michael Michelle, Sam Underwood and Anna Brenda Contreras.

    I'm surprised with all the internet scuttle-butt that there isn't more gossip surrounding the cast changes National Enquirer style, which happened on original Dynasty. You would think there would be more crew leaks or gossip from the cast and crew. So either they've been told to be tight lipped, or viewers just aren't that interested and invested in the series.
     
  3. Ferdnand Colby

    Ferdnand Colby Soap Chat Member

    Message Count:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    74
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Ángeles
    Ratings:
    +68
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, tbh, I don't find sets looking that cheap. I mean, daily soaps ARE cheap. Sometimes walls even move, LOL.
    Maybe they need to reduce costs and welcome new writers, and perhaps more talented people. I'm pretty sure Catherine Oxenberg didn't have a high salary at the beginning of her Amanda, and she managed to deliver a character for a couple of years. I know she wasn't a Meryl Streep, but, it's not like Dynasty or any prime time soap are Oscar's nominees either. Another example of this was the girl playing Summer in The OC, she started as an extra and I guess when she was offered a real role, she wasn't high paid either. I think it's a matter of quality and not quantity (big names, big sets, big egos), after all, as I pointed out before, it's a soap opera. It's more about an interesting story, capitalizing actors, and not actors supporting a - ridiculous - story.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Daniel Avery

    Daniel Avery Super Moderator Staff Member

    Message Count:
    2,422
    Trophy Points:
    5,327
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    Ratings:
    +4,358
    Medals:
    3
    Member Since:
    June 10, 2000
    The Enquirer only pursued leaks and spoilers on original Dynasty and the other nighttime soaps because they were the top-rated shows with the most buzz. In the pre-internet era you almost had to rely on gossip mags for information. With NuDynasty's very low ratings, the editors likely would not publish a scoop even if they had it, since so much of the surviving magazines today have to pursue reality 'stars' and the largest-common-denominator shows. Most of the TV show scoops end up on the internet well before magazines can put them into print anyway.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. Willie Oleson

    Willie Oleson drilling for soap

    Message Count:
    9,953
    Trophy Points:
    8,250
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    somewherie on the prairie
    Ratings:
    +18,433
    Medals:
    11
    Member Since:
    April 2002
    Today I actually had a magazine in my hands, well I never had the chance to read it because the dentist called my name.
    The headlines screamed "painful divorce!" and "public feud!" and it made me feel excited like it did in the good old days when I used to read all these ehm...critically acclaimed news magazines.
    I'm considering a subscription (and a p.o. box)
     
    • Cyber Hug Cyber Hug x 1
  6. Michael Torrance

    Michael Torrance Soap Chat Dream Maker

    Message Count:
    1,893
    Trophy Points:
    892
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alexis' studio
    Ratings:
    +3,128
    Gender:
    Male
    Member Since:
    2017 I think (unless it is 2016)
    I am pretty sure more is written on this forum about the Gillieathon that on all the other forums, websites, etc. altogether.
     
  7. Rove

    Rove Soap Chat Enthusiast

    Message Count:
    2,241
    Trophy Points:
    1,323
    Location:
    Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
    Ratings:
    +3,721
    How rude!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. Daniel Avery

    Daniel Avery Super Moderator Staff Member

    Message Count:
    2,422
    Trophy Points:
    5,327
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    Ratings:
    +4,358
    Medals:
    3
    Member Since:
    June 10, 2000
    Granted, I do not seek out articles on the show written elsewhere, but I do see a smattering of coverage on the website TVLine.com . I think someone on their staff must be a fan (or, at the very least, was a fan of the original).
     
  9. xab

    xab Soap Chat Member

    Message Count:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    france
    Ratings:
    +160
    Tonight watching a Dallas episode came across my mind. For some reasons I needed to. Sometimes past is much more comfortable than present. But this not not my point.
    I was amazed at the structure of the season. Let alone my memories and the nostalgia included in, those shows knew (for better or worse) how to build a season. OldDynasty might have been a mess, a boring jam, I never felt the show was off-dynasty. Out of character maybe sometimes, but worst Dynasty still remained Dynasty.

    This show is schizophrenic. Three (or four or five...) shows within a reboot of a single one... (Mary Tyler Moore and Twilight Zone are not so far...)

    My last word will be Miss Bette D. 's :

     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. thomaswak

    thomaswak Soap Chat Active Member

    Message Count:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    174
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    France
    Ratings:
    +301
    Gender:
    Male
    I get your point Xab. I can relate, as I have been complaining a lot about the writing. But for some reason, I still enjoy the show. It's not a soap. Not a drama. Not a comedy. It's unfortunately a parody. A Caricature. But sometimes, it delivers goods episodes. It's rare. Very rare. Yet, I enjoy them when - miraculously - they're good.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  11. MarkSinacori

    MarkSinacori Soap Chat Fan

    Message Count:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    174
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Ratings:
    +129
    You have the teaser scene, then the 4 acts that follow for hour long drama. I hear there can also be 6 acts, but when I write hour long, I stick to how I'd end each segment before commercial, so the next act would pick up after the commercial. One page of script= 1 minute of time, usually. Still, it depends on what is shot, how fast it's shot, how it's edited, et.

    For hour long, 10 to 11 or 12 pages per act. Maybe 5 or 6 scenes per act as well, maybe more, if there are very short scenes as well.

    50, 60 pages or so. Still, stuff would probably be edited down or out to bring the finished product to enough screentime for the hour.


    I never write in 6 acts post-teaser scene, as there are NOT 6 commercial breaks, so it gets confusing.


    For half hour sitcoms there is a cold opening, then act 1 and act 2 and a tag scene. Pretty much nowadays I think that's how it is. Over the years it was all over the place. Some shows would not go to a commercial break before the tag, some would, et. Not sure if it's the same way on all sitcoms now. I do know there is ONE commercial break between the first act of several scenes post-cold opening, and then the 2nd batch of scenes.


    On soaps of the 80s, they had 4 acts only (unless they wrote in 6), I think. They showed what happened in the previous episode, then the opening credits, then just went right into act 1. No teaser scenes like 90210/Melrose Place did as those shows went on.


    I touch upon the 6 act because I've seen posts on how shows do that nowadays that are hour long, but it would get confusing to me to write it in 6 as I'd rather just end the act where the commercial would go (4 acts). I know I saw a sample of Melrose Place 2nd episode of season 4 online script and it was in 4 acts, I believe. A teaser and 4 acts, BUT, I believe one or two of the scenes that ended segments before commercials were NOT how it was finalized, they used different scenes, possibly due to editing/timing.
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2019 at 2:16 PM

Share This Page